From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlstrom v. Hauser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1976
54 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Summary

reducing 180day suspension to two-month suspension

Summary of this case from Seabrook v. City of New York

Opinion

October 12, 1976


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, by a firefighter employed by the City of Newburgh, to review a determination of respondent, the City Manager of the City of Newburgh, dated July 11, 1974, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of two charges of improper use of sick leave, each charge covering a three-day period, and suspended him for a period of 180 working days, with those working days which accrued during the suspension period immediately prior to the hearing to be credited against the time of the suspension. Determination modified, on the law, by reducing the suspension to a period of two months, which period shall not include the 30-day period of suspension which was prior to the hearing. As so modified, determination confirmed and proceeding otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. No fact findings were presented for review. The determination is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. However, the penalty imposed by respondent was in violation of subdivision 3 of section 75 Civ. Serv. of the Civil Service Law, which provides that if an officer or employee governed by that section is found guilty of the charges brought, the penalty may consist of a "suspension without pay for a period not exceeding two months". Accordingly, we have reduced petitioner's suspension to a period of two months. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carlstrom v. Hauser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1976
54 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

reducing 180day suspension to two-month suspension

Summary of this case from Seabrook v. City of New York
Case details for

Carlstrom v. Hauser

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. CARLSTROM, Petitioner, v. JAMES J. HAUSER, JR., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Seabrook v. City of New York

The statute sets forth those substantive penalties with specific limitations, which may not be exceeded. See,…

James v. Hoosick Falls Cent. Sch. Dist.

(Civil Service Law § 75(3) [emphasis added] ). A public employer may not choose to impose a penalty in excess…