From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 22, 1999
745 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

holding that while the appellant did not object at sentencing to the imposition of a public defender lien, the issue could be addressed on appeal because the appellant filed a timely rule 3.800(b) motion with the trial court

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. State

Opinion

No. 98-3888.

Opinion filed November 22, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, Judge J. Lewis Hall.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Carol Ann Turner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Veronica S. McCrackin, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Theodora Campbell appeals a final order placing her on probation, contending only that the trial court erred by imposing a public defender lien without giving her an opportunity to contest the amount of the lien. Although the defendant did not object at sentencing, she properly preserved the issue for review by filing a timely rule 3.800(b) motion, which the trial court denied. We reverse. When a public defender lien is imposed, the trial court must give the defendant notice of the right to contest the amount of the lien. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1). If the defendant wishes to contest the lien, the trial court must set a hearing for that purpose within thirty days of the sentencing date. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.270(d)(2). Because these procedures were not followed here, we reverse and remand with instructions to afford the defendant a hearing on the amount of the lien.

ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Campbell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 22, 1999
745 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

holding that while the appellant did not object at sentencing to the imposition of a public defender lien, the issue could be addressed on appeal because the appellant filed a timely rule 3.800(b) motion with the trial court

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. State

holding that while the appellant did not object at sentencing to the imposition of a public defender lien, the issue could be addressed on appeal because the appellant filed a timely rule 3.800(b) motion with the trial court.

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. State
Case details for

Campbell v. State

Case Details

Full title:THEODORA CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 22, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Schimmel v. State

The court erred by ordering appellant to pay the amount of the lien without first affording her notice of the…

Schimmel v. State

The court erred by ordering appellant to pay the amount of the hen without first affording him notice of the…