From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1949
299 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1949)

Summary

In Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros., Inc. (299 N.Y. 636; remittitur amended, 299 N.Y. 795 [1949]), the court held that the Feld-Crawford Act and the Miller-Tydings amendment to the Sherman Act (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 1) permitted suits against non-signatories relating to commodities in interstate commerce.

Summary of this case from Rothbaum v. Macy Co.

Opinion

Argued April 14, 1949

Decided May 26, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, KOCH, J.

Orrin G. Judd, Louis Glazer, Ruth I. Wilson and Earle K. Moore for appellant.

Malcolm L. Fleischer, Leo Greenfield and Herbert M. Markham for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1949
299 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1949)

In Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros., Inc. (299 N.Y. 636; remittitur amended, 299 N.Y. 795 [1949]), the court held that the Feld-Crawford Act and the Miller-Tydings amendment to the Sherman Act (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 1) permitted suits against non-signatories relating to commodities in interstate commerce.

Summary of this case from Rothbaum v. Macy Co.
Case details for

Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CALAMIA, Individually and Trading under the Name of REINHARD BROS.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 26, 1949

Citations

299 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1949)
87 N.E.2d 50

Citing Cases

Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Corp.

The contention that the "non-signer" provisions are not within the Miller-Tydings Amendment appears to have…

Rothbaum v. Macy Co.

He relies on the rule of Bourjois Sales Corp. v. Dorfman (273 N.Y. 167 [1937]) that under the Feld-Crawford…