Summary
holding defendant with concurrent twenty-five-year sentences was entitled to judicial review after twenty years
Summary of this case from Montgomery v. StateOpinion
Case No. 5D15–3478
03-03-2017
Jessy J. BURROWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Jessy J. Burrows, Arcadia, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Jessy J. Burrows, Arcadia, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Jessy J. Burrows appeals his concurrent twenty-five-year sentences for his numerous non-homicide offenses committed when he was seventeen years old. The State properly concedes that Burrows is entitled to resentencing. See Kelsey v. State , 206 So.3d 5, 8 (Fla. 2016) ("[A]ll juvenile offenders whose sentences meet the standard defined by the Legislature in chapter 2014–220, a sentence longer than twenty years, are entitled to judicial review."). Therefore, we reverse Burrows's sentences and remand for resentencing under chapter 2014–220, Laws of Florida.
REVERSED and REMANDED for Resentencing.
SAWAYA, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.