From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bull v. San Francisco

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2009
558 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2009)

Summary

granting en banc review

Summary of this case from T.S. v. Doe

Opinion

Nos. 05-17080, 06-15566.

February 20, 2009.

Mark E. Merin, Esquire, Law Offices of Mark E. Merin, Sacramento, CA, Andrew Charles Schwartz, Casper Meadows Schwartz, PC, Walnut Creek, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Robert Andres Bonta, Esquire, David B. Newdorf, Esquire, San Francisco City Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

CV-03-01840-CRB/EMC.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Bull v. San Francisco

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2009
558 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2009)

granting en banc review

Summary of this case from T.S. v. Doe

granting en banc review

Summary of this case from T.S. v. Doe

granting rehearing en banc

Summary of this case from Refai v. Lazaro
Case details for

Bull v. San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:Mary BULL; Jonah Zern, and all others similarly situated; Laura Timbrook…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 2009

Citations

558 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Co. of Burlington

See Powell, 541 F.3d at 1314 (subjecting arrestees to visual strip searches during the booking process…

Boone v. City of Philadelphia

Another circuit is reconsidering its line of cases on the issue and rehearing a strip-search case en banc.…