From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bull v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Feb 7, 2013
ACTION NO. 2:12cv183 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2013)

Summary

stating that because the Appeals Council had refused to review the ALJ's decision after its remand, it became the final decision of the Commissioner, and the court could "only consider the evaluations of the ALJ in his second decision" under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Summary of this case from Pauley v. Berryhill

Opinion

ACTION NO. 2:12cv183

02-07-2013

JOHN R. BULL, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


FINAL ORDER

Plaintiff John Bull, proceeding pro se, seeks judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his claim for a period of disability insurance benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act.

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as Rule 72 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for a report and recommendation. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge was filed on January 3, 2013, recommending that the Court grant the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, deny plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and affirm the final decision of the Commissioner. By copy of the report, each party was advised of the right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

On January 22, 2013, the Court received Plaintiff's Response to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22), and on January 25, 2013, Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 23).

Having reviewed the record and the objections filed by Plaintiff, and finding no error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on January 3, 2013, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED.

Plaintiff is ADVISED that he may appeal from this Final Order by forwarding a written notice of appeal to the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. Said written notice must be received by the Clerk within sixty (60) days from the date of this Final Order.

The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Final Order to Plaintiff and to counsel of record for Defendant.

________________________

Mark S. Davis

United States District Judge
Norfolk, Virginia
February 6, 2013


Summaries of

Bull v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Feb 7, 2013
ACTION NO. 2:12cv183 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2013)

stating that because the Appeals Council had refused to review the ALJ's decision after its remand, it became the final decision of the Commissioner, and the court could "only consider the evaluations of the ALJ in his second decision" under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Summary of this case from Pauley v. Berryhill
Case details for

Bull v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN R. BULL, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

ACTION NO. 2:12cv183 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2013)

Citing Cases

Pauley v. Berryhill

In the present case, the Appeals Council denied Claimant's request for review, which indicates that the…