In Broydo v Baxter D. Whitney Sons, Inc. (24 Misc 3d 1207[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51295[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2009]), the court noted the duty imposed on common carriers because of a special relationship.
Summary of this case from Empire One Telecom v. VerizonNo. 36387/04.
June 23, 2009.
Products Liability — Liability of Manufacturer's Successor Corporation.
In Broydo v Baxter D. Whitney Sons, Inc. (24 Misc 3d 1207[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51295[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2009]), the court noted the duty imposed on common carriers because of a special relationship.
Summary of this case from Empire One Telecom v. VerizonIn Broydo v Baxter D. Whitney Sons, Inc., 24 Misc 3d 1207A [Sup Ct, Kings County 2009], the court noted the duty imposed on common carriers because of a special relationship.
Summary of this case from EMPIRE ONE TELECOM., INC. v. VERIZON NY, INC.Full title:Broydo v. Baxter D. Whitney Sons, Inc
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Date published: Jun 23, 2009
In Gross v Sweet ( 49 NY2d 102, 106-107), the Court of Appeals noted that agreements to exculpate for…
Vasquez v. Ranieri Cheese CorporationNotwithstanding the absence of an express disclaimer of liability in the March 28, 2005 purchase agreement,…