From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown-Monroe v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2012
Case No. CV 10-5076-MWF (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)

Summary

holding that § 4019 does not offend the Equal Protection Clause

Summary of this case from Duross v. Cal. State Prison

Opinion

Case No. CV 10-5076-MWF (RNB)

12-11-2012

CHRISTOPHER BROWN-MONROE, Petitioner, v. M.D. McDONALD, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

________________________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown-Monroe v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2012
Case No. CV 10-5076-MWF (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)

holding that § 4019 does not offend the Equal Protection Clause

Summary of this case from Duross v. Cal. State Prison

finding that Tollett foreclosed claims that counsel was "ineffective for failing to present a viable defense" and that counsel "fail[ed] to investigate evidence independently" because such claims "purport to be directed solely at conduct of trial counsel that preceded the entry of petitioner's guilty plea"

Summary of this case from United States v. Hanks
Case details for

Brown-Monroe v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BROWN-MONROE, Petitioner, v. M.D. McDONALD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

Case No. CV 10-5076-MWF (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hanks

Doc. 48 at 33. Although Petitioner seems to argue that Wynne's failure to investigate these possible defenses…

Nogales v. Becerra

ve a beginning, and thus to discriminate between the rights of an earlier and later time."); McQueary v.…