affirming the Superior Court's conclusion that Brooks' Brady claim in his fourth postconviction motion was procedurally barred under Rule 61 and the Superior Court's denial of Brooks' request for an evidentiary hearing to review the records
Summary of this case from Brooks v. DennNo. 735, 2009.
June 2, 2010.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 86002026D1.
AFFIRMED.
affirming the Superior Court's conclusion that Brooks' Brady claim in his fourth postconviction motion was procedurally barred under Rule 61 and the Superior Court's denial of Brooks' request for an evidentiary hearing to review the records
Summary of this case from Brooks v. Dennaffirming denial of fourth
Summary of this case from State v. BrooksFull title:Brooks v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Jun 2, 2010
Even assuming Defendant's Brady claim were valid, Jackson would explicitly not rescue Defendant's Motion from…
State v. BrooksBrooks v. State, 637 A.2d 825 (Del. 1994) (TABLE). Brooks v. State, 787 A.2d 100 (Del. 2001) (TABLE)…