From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briggs v. Colvin

United States District Court Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division
Sep 4, 2013
1:12-cv-00195-GCM-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sep. 4, 2013)

Summary

holding that a treating source's statement that a claimant was disabled did not constitute a medical opinion

Summary of this case from Livingston v. Colvin

Opinion

1:12-cv-00195-GCM-DCK

09-04-2013

Kay Briggs, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.


JUDGMENT IN CASE

DECISION BY COURT. This action having come before the Court and a decision having been rendered; IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's September 4, 2013 Order.

________

Frank G. Johns, Clerk

United States District Court


Summaries of

Briggs v. Colvin

United States District Court Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division
Sep 4, 2013
1:12-cv-00195-GCM-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sep. 4, 2013)

holding that a treating source's statement that a claimant was disabled did not constitute a medical opinion

Summary of this case from Livingston v. Colvin
Case details for

Briggs v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Kay Briggs, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division

Date published: Sep 4, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-00195-GCM-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sep. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Livingston v. Colvin

Clearly, because such opinion touches on a vocational issue reserved for the Commissioner, it is not a…