From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brewer v. Dist. of Columbia

United States District Court, District of Columbia.
May 22, 2015
105 F. Supp. 3d 74 (D.D.C. 2015)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding that the plaintiff had failed to state claims because the fact-finding in an earlier litigation was preclusive as to an essential element of those claims

Summary of this case from Massey v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11–cv–1206 (KBJ)

05-22-2015

Willie Brewer, Plaintiff, v. District of Columbia, et al., Defendants.

Kerry J. Davidson, Law Offices of Kerry J. Davidson, Silver Spring, MD, for Plaintiff. Joseph Alfonso Gonzalez, Denise J. Baker, Office of Attorney General, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

Kerry J. Davidson, Law Offices of Kerry J. Davidson, Silver Spring, MD, for Plaintiff.

Joseph Alfonso Gonzalez, Denise J. Baker, Office of Attorney General, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Summaries of

Brewer v. Dist. of Columbia

United States District Court, District of Columbia.
May 22, 2015
105 F. Supp. 3d 74 (D.D.C. 2015)

concluding that the plaintiff had failed to state claims because the fact-finding in an earlier litigation was preclusive as to an essential element of those claims

Summary of this case from Massey v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.
Case details for

Brewer v. Dist. of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:Willie Brewer, Plaintiff, v. District of Columbia, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Date published: May 22, 2015

Citations

105 F. Supp. 3d 74 (D.D.C. 2015)
324 Ed. Law Rep. 858
2015 Fair. Empl. Prac. Cas. 183

Citing Cases

Willis v. Gray

"Generally speaking, res judicata is a well-settled doctrine pursuant to which courts preclude parties from…

Goode v. Dist. of Columbia

Issue preclusion occurs where "(1) the issue was actually litigated; (2) was determined by a valid, final…

6 Citing Cases