From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blakley v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 3, 2009
Case No. C08-5186BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 3, 2009)

Summary

Noting simple repetitive work is more in line with reasoning level one

Summary of this case from Marcelli v. Colvin

Opinion

Case No. C08-5186BHS.

February 3, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 16). The Court having considered the Report and Recommendation, the parties' failure to file objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; and
(2) This action is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings as set out in the Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Blakley v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 3, 2009
Case No. C08-5186BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 3, 2009)

Noting simple repetitive work is more in line with reasoning level one

Summary of this case from Marcelli v. Colvin
Case details for

Blakley v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VICKI BLAKLEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Feb 3, 2009

Citations

Case No. C08-5186BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wesselius v. Astrue

Second, the ALJ conflated two separate vocational considerations. Contrary to the ALJ's decision and the…

Welch v. Astrue

Other cases cited by the plaintiff that address GED reasoning level 3 also rely, in the main, on a purported…