From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BLAKE v. UPMC PASSAVANT HOSPITAL

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-193 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2008)

Summary

holding that when remedies under the FMLA were available to plaintiff to redress his injury, a claim for wrongful discharge would not lie

Summary of this case from Duran v. Cnty. of Clinton

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-193.

April 4, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 4 th day of April, 2008, after the plaintiff, John Blake, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Summary Judgment was filed by defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until March 24, 2008, to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff and the response to those objections filed by defendant, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by defendants [Dkt. 26] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

BLAKE v. UPMC PASSAVANT HOSPITAL

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-193 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2008)

holding that when remedies under the FMLA were available to plaintiff to redress his injury, a claim for wrongful discharge would not lie

Summary of this case from Duran v. Cnty. of Clinton
Case details for

BLAKE v. UPMC PASSAVANT HOSPITAL

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BLAKE, Plaintiff, v. UPMC PASSAVANT HOSPITAL, JOE KUZMA, individually…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 4, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-193 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Munoz v. Nutrisystem, Inc.

Munoz has provided no legal authority for that position, and I have found none. On the contrary, a number of…

Duran v. Cnty. of Clinton

Courts interpreting Pennsylvania law have consistently rejected a separate cause of action for wrongful…