From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beauregard v. Commonwealth Electric

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 2, 1983
440 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

upholding section 440.15(a)1 and, which placed a dollar cap on eye injuries to the extent that, the claimants argued, the benefits provided were so paltry as to deny them redress for their injuries, as provided in article I, section 21, Florida Constitution

Summary of this case from Newton v. McCotter Motors, Inc.

Opinion

No. AP-479.

November 2, 1983.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Alex Lancaster, Sarasota, for appellant.

James F. Pingel, Jr., Tampa, for appellees.


Appellant, 54 years of age, lost all sight in one eye as a result of an industrial accident. His claims for medical, rehabilitative and wage-loss benefits were apparently honored, or at least not contested in these proceedings before the deputy. He has received permanent impairment benefits of $1,200 in accordance with section 440.15(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), and he asserts that the benefits provided in that class by the 1981 statute are so paltry as to deny him redress for his injury. Art. I, sec. 21, Fla. Const. As points of comparison he points to pre-1979 benefits of "at least $10,000" and to common law judgments, for loss of an eye due to another's negligence, in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. 5 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts Ann. (Supp. 1980). Appellees respond to the effect that legislation like chapter 440 is designed to compensate principally for loss of earning capacity or earnings. 2 LARSON'S WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, § 57.11 (1982); Magic City Bottle and Supply Co. v. Robinson, 116 So.2d 240, 243 (Fla. 1959).

We adhere to this court's decision in Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 419 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), pet. for rev. granted, Fla. Supreme Court Case No. 62,721, holding that this law is constitutional.

AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON, J., concurs.

BOOTH, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Beauregard v. Commonwealth Electric

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 2, 1983
440 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

upholding section 440.15(a)1 and, which placed a dollar cap on eye injuries to the extent that, the claimants argued, the benefits provided were so paltry as to deny them redress for their injuries, as provided in article I, section 21, Florida Constitution

Summary of this case from Newton v. McCotter Motors, Inc.
Case details for

Beauregard v. Commonwealth Electric

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BEAUREGARD, APPELLANT, v. COMMONWEALTH ELECTRIC AND AETNA CASUALTY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 2, 1983

Citations

440 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Newton v. McCotter Motors, Inc.

Compare Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hospital, 418 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (the fact that the 1979…

McCotter Motors, Inc. v. Newton

Compare Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hospital, 418 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [the fact that the 1979…