From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beauclair v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Mar 4, 2016
366 P.3d 667 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

explaining that criminal defendants may challenge their sentences under K.S.A. 60–1507 only after exhausting all appeals in their direct criminal cases

Summary of this case from Horn v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 112,556.

03-04-2016

Danny E. BEAUCLAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Kansas, Appellee.

Jonathan B. Phelps, Phelps–Chartered, of Topeka, for appellant. Jodi Litfin, assistant district attorney, Chadwick J. Taylor, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.

Decision Without Published Opinion

Affirmed.

Summaries of

Beauclair v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Mar 4, 2016
366 P.3d 667 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

explaining that criminal defendants may challenge their sentences under K.S.A. 60–1507 only after exhausting all appeals in their direct criminal cases

Summary of this case from Horn v. State
Case details for

Beauclair v. State

Case Details

Full title:Danny E. BEAUCLAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Kansas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Mar 4, 2016

Citations

366 P.3d 667 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Beauclair v. State

Our Court of Appeals rejected Beauclair's claims and affirmed the district court. See Beauclair v. State ,…

Horn v. State

Although the State argues that Horn waived any argument that Lewis failed to adequately raise the alleged…

2 Citing Cases