holding that this Court's procedural requirements regarding the development of a complete record to establish a prima facie case of a Batson violation is an unreasonable application of federal law
Summary of this case from Com. v. HackettNo. 04-101.
November 1, 2004.
Certiorari denied.
C.A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted.
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 355 F. 3d 707.
holding that this Court's procedural requirements regarding the development of a complete record to establish a prima facie case of a Batson violation is an unreasonable application of federal law
Summary of this case from Com. v. HackettFull title:BEARD, SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 1, 2004
" Vasquez-Lopez, 22 F.3d at 902 (citations omitted); see also United States v. Omoruyi, 7 F.3d 880, 882 (9th…
Coombs v. DiguglielmoThe Supreme Court subsequently denied certiorari in that case. See Beard v. Holloway, 543 U.S. 976, 125 S.Ct.…