From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Pivnichny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 24, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-700 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2015)

Summary

denying Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as defective pursuant to statute and Court Order dated November 6, 2013 in Civil Action No. 13-1198

Summary of this case from Banks v. Francis

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-700

06-24-2015

FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
ECF No. 1 MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff commenced this civil action on May 29, 2015 by filing a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) on Form AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, along with a copy of the Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 2), filed on June 2, 2015, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made via First Class Mail on Frederick Banks at his address of record, U.S. Steel Tower, 600 Grant Street, Suite 660, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. Plaintiff was informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that he had fourteen (14) days to file any objections. Plaintiff has not filed any Objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 2) as of this date.

Therefore, after a de novo review of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and attachments thereto, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2015,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Frederick Banks (ECF No. 1) is DENIED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff Frederick Banks wishes to continue to pursue this civil action, he must file a motion to reopen the case and submit either the required certification statement or the $400 filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 2) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated June 2, 2015, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

/s/_________

DAVID STEWART CERCONE

United States District Judge
cc: Frederick Banks

U.S. Steel Tower

600 Grant Street

Suite 660

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Via First Class Mail


Summaries of

Banks v. Pivnichny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 24, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-700 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2015)

denying Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as defective pursuant to statute and Court Order dated November 6, 2013 in Civil Action No. 13-1198

Summary of this case from Banks v. Francis
Case details for

Banks v. Pivnichny

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 24, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-700 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Banks v. Francis

Rather than heed these warnings, Petitioner has chosen to persist in duplicative, harassing, vexatious and…