From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAIN v. HOFMANN

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jun 25, 2007
File No. 1:06-CV-168 (D. Vt. Jun. 25, 2007)

Summary

denying a motion for injunctive relief because, inter alia, "[t]he claims set forth in Bain's motion are not claims that were presented in either his initial or his amended complaints"

Summary of this case from McMillian v. Konecny

Opinion

File No. 1:06-CV-168.

June 25, 2007


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed May 14, 2007 (Paper 31). After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Prison Health Services, Inc. (Paper 24) is GRANTED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motions for Protective Order (Papers 19 and 30) are DENIED.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BAIN v. HOFMANN

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jun 25, 2007
File No. 1:06-CV-168 (D. Vt. Jun. 25, 2007)

denying a motion for injunctive relief because, inter alia, "[t]he claims set forth in Bain's motion are not claims that were presented in either his initial or his amended complaints"

Summary of this case from McMillian v. Konecny
Case details for

BAIN v. HOFMANN

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BAIN, Plaintiff v. ROBERT HOFMANN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Jun 25, 2007

Citations

File No. 1:06-CV-168 (D. Vt. Jun. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

McMillian v. Konecny

Because one of the issues presented by a motion for injunctive relief is whether the movant has shown a…