From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baggett v. Rehau, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 31, 2011
411 F. App'x 280 (11th Cir. 2011)

Summary

applying the sham affidavit rule to prior written evidence

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Koch Foods, Inc.

Opinion

No. 10-10756.

January 31, 2011.

Alicia K. Haynes, Haynes Haynes PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mieke Ann Hemstreet, David Turner Wiley, Jackson Lewis LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. D.C. Docket No. 2:07-cv-02224-LSC.

Before BLACK, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.


After review of the parties' briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, the Court finds no reversible error in the district court's order dated January 21, 2010, which adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 15, 2009. Accordingly, this Court affirms the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Rehau, Inc. on plaintiff Brad Baggett's Complaint.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Baggett v. Rehau, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 31, 2011
411 F. App'x 280 (11th Cir. 2011)

applying the sham affidavit rule to prior written evidence

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Koch Foods, Inc.
Case details for

Baggett v. Rehau, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Brad BAGGETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REHAU, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 31, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 280 (11th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. Koch Foods, Inc.

See Tippens v. Celotex Corp., 805 F.2d 949, 953 (11th Cir. 1986) (“[T]he affidavit should be disregarded as a…