holding that district court did not err in conducting in camera interview of each juror because how best to gather information regarding alleged juror misconduct is a matter of trial court discretion
Summary of this case from Hall v. StateNo. 88-2095.
October 2, 1989.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 870 F. 2d 1105.
holding that district court did not err in conducting in camera interview of each juror because how best to gather information regarding alleged juror misconduct is a matter of trial court discretion
Summary of this case from Hall v. Statefinding no antitrust injury where plaintiffs had stated an antitrust violation, but where the alleged injury would have resulted even in the absence of the antitrust violation, because of the existence of patents preventing market entry
Summary of this case from In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigationfollowing World-Wide Volkswagen and rejecting Justice O'Connor's Asahi plurality
Summary of this case from Editorial Musical Latino Americana, S.A. v. Mar International Records, Inc.Full title:AXIS, S. P. A. v. MICAFIL, Inc
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 2, 1989
Bullion v. Gillespie, 895 F.2d 213, 217 (5th Cir. 1990) ("[O]n a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,…
Cox Cable New Orleans, Inc. v. City of New OrleansThe unconstitutionality of one portion of a law does not render the entire law unenforceable if the remaining…