From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avila v. Biedess

Supreme Court of Arizona
Mar 16, 2004
85 P.3d 474 (Ariz. 2004)

Summary

describing § 36-3702 screening as "required"

Summary of this case from Garcia v. Butler

Opinion

Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-03-0406-PR Court of Appeals Division One Nos. 1 CA-CV 02-0648 and 1 CA-CV 02-0741 Maricopa County Superior Court No. CV 2002-011072

March 16, 2004.


The following action was taken by the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona on March 16, 2004, in regard to the above-referenced cause:

ORDERED: Kurti Appellees' Petition for Review = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Avila Appellants' Petition for Review = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Request for Attorneys' Fees [Appellees Kurti] = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Request for Attorneys' Fees [Appellees Avila] = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals' Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

Justice Hurwitz voted to grant review.


Summaries of

Avila v. Biedess

Supreme Court of Arizona
Mar 16, 2004
85 P.3d 474 (Ariz. 2004)

describing § 36-3702 screening as "required"

Summary of this case from Garcia v. Butler
Case details for

Avila v. Biedess

Case Details

Full title:BRUNO AVILA et ux et al v. P BIEDESS/AHCCCS

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Mar 16, 2004

Citations

85 P.3d 474 (Ariz. 2004)

Citing Cases

In re Royce Z.

The availability of some of the safeguards of criminal trials "does not transform SVP proceedings into…

In re Pima Cnty. Mental Health Cause No. A20020026

¶ 10 Sanchez next asserts his statements made to Balestreri should have been suppressed because they were…