inferring that the Secretary of Labor determined "that plaintiff's claim is cognizable under the FECA" because the Department of Labor "ruled on the merits of plaintiff's FECA claim"
Summary of this case from Bourke v. United StatesNo. 93-7052.
August 23, 1993.
M.D.Pa., Rambo, J., 809 F.Supp. 365.
AFFIRMED
inferring that the Secretary of Labor determined "that plaintiff's claim is cognizable under the FECA" because the Department of Labor "ruled on the merits of plaintiff's FECA claim"
Summary of this case from Bourke v. United Statesinferring that the ECAB determined "that plaintiff's claim is cognizable under the FECA" because the ECAB "ruled on the merits of plaintiff's FECA claim"
Summary of this case from Hawkins v. United StatesFull title:Atlantic Health Care Benefits Trust v. Foster
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Aug 23, 1993
See United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224 (3d Cir. 1985). Following the criteria set forth in Daubert v.…
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerOther federal courts have found the expert evidence to be inadmissible. See Raynor v. Merrell Pharms., Inc.,…