From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asaro v. McGuire Auto Rental Leasing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Summary

describing the presumption as "very strong"

Summary of this case from Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Frey

Opinion

April 14, 1997


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, the defendant McGuire Auto Rental Leasing, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated February 27, 1995, as, after a hearing, granted the plaintiffs' motion to strike its affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 there is a very strong presumption that the vehicle driven by the defendant Michael Van Malmberg was operated with the consent of the owner, the defendant McGuire Auto Rental Leasing, Inc., and such presumption, in this case, was not overcome by substantial evidence to the contrary ( see, Wynn v. Middleton, 184 A.D.2d 1019; Stewart v. Town of Hempstead, 204 A.D.2d 431). Therefore, service upon the Secretary of State pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 253, which authorizes such service upon a nonresident owner of a vehicle where the vehicle was used with the owner's permission, was proper in this case, and jurisdiction over the defendant was properly acquired.

Since the record reflects that the question of whether the vehicle was operated with permission was determined by the Supreme Court after a hearing held upon the consent of the parties, there is no error in failing to have the issue determined by a jury ( cf., Lipetz v. Palmer, 216 A.D.2d 367). Altman, J.P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Asaro v. McGuire Auto Rental Leasing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

describing the presumption as "very strong"

Summary of this case from Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Frey
Case details for

Asaro v. McGuire Auto Rental Leasing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ASARO et al., Respondents, v. McGUIRE AUTO RENTAL LEASING, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Matter of General Accident Ins. v. Bonefont

Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 there is a "very strong" presumption that a vehicle is operated…

Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Frey

However, state law still presumes that Nunez had National's consent to drive the car and Ace has not rebutted…