noting that courts have refused to impose section 324A liability without a showing that defendant undertook responsibility with respect to the specific product that caused the injury
Summary of this case from Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.1996. Pages 846 — 860
Reprinted without change in the Review Granted Opinions Pamphlet to permit tracking pending review and disposition by the Supreme Court.
noting that courts have refused to impose section 324A liability without a showing that defendant undertook responsibility with respect to the specific product that caused the injury
Summary of this case from Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Full title:Artiglio v. Corning, Inc
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
The scope of this undertaking defines and limits an actor's duty under section 324A. See, e.g., Homer v.…
Artiglio v. Corning, Inc.Review Dismissed in Part July 30, 1997. Previously published at 49 Cal.App.4th 845, 50 Cal.App.4th 917A…