From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARP v. PARKDALE MILLS, INC

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 28, 2003
356 N.C. 657 (N.C. 2003)

Summary

resting reversal on reasons set forth in the court of appeals dissent

Summary of this case from Fitzgeralds Casino/Hotel v. Mogg

Opinion


576 S.E.2d 326 (N.C. 2003) 356 N.C. 657 Richard ARP, Employee, v. PARKDALE MILLS, INCORPORATED, Employer, Cameron M. Harris & Company, Third Party Administrator. No. 311A02. Supreme Court of North Carolina Feb. 28, 2003.

        Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 150 N.C.App. 266, 563 S.E.2d 62 (2002), affirming an opinion and award entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 7 March 2001. Heard in the Supreme Court 4 December 2002.

        Grandy & Martin, PA, by Charles William Grandy, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

        Alala Mullen Holland & Cooper, P.A., by H. Randolph Sumner and Jesse V. Bone, Jr., Gastonia, for defendant-appellants.

        PER CURIAM.

        For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.

        REVERSED AND REMANDED.

        Justice BRADY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

ARP v. PARKDALE MILLS, INC

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 28, 2003
356 N.C. 657 (N.C. 2003)

resting reversal on reasons set forth in the court of appeals dissent

Summary of this case from Fitzgeralds Casino/Hotel v. Mogg
Case details for

ARP v. PARKDALE MILLS, INC

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ARP, Employee v. PARKDALE MILLS, INCORPORATED, Employer, CAMERON…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 28, 2003

Citations

356 N.C. 657 (N.C. 2003)
356 N.C. 657

Citing Cases

Weaver v. Dedmon

Here, plaintiff testified that Schuck authorized him to ride the forklift.Id. at 301-02, 519 S.E.2d at 780…

Watts v. Borg Warner Automotive, Inc.

The burden of proving the causal relationship or connection rests with the claimant." Arp v. Parkdale Mills,…