From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Curtis

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 21, 2021
957 N.W.2d 24 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Summary

noting our "statutes mention nothing about assigning sole decision-making authority for some responsibilities and joint participation for others"

Summary of this case from Moses v. Rosol

Opinion

No. 20-0632

01-21-2021

Easton ARMSTRONG, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Holly CURTIS, Respondent-Appellant.

Andrew B. Howie of Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese, P.C., West Des Moines, for appellant. Catherine Z. Cartee and Chase Cartee of Cartee Law Firm, P.C., Davenport, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Curtis

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 21, 2021
957 N.W.2d 24 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

noting our "statutes mention nothing about assigning sole decision-making authority for some responsibilities and joint participation for others"

Summary of this case from Moses v. Rosol
Case details for

Armstrong v. Curtis

Case Details

Full title:EASTON ARMSTRONG, Petitioner-Appellee, v. HOLLY CURTIS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

957 N.W.2d 24 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Moses v. Rosol

We do not consider whether it is permissible to maintain joint legal custody while giving one parent sole…

Kocinski v. Christiansen

Our supreme court has not spoken on the matter. Armstrong v. Curtis, No. 20-0632, 2021 WL 210965, at *3 (Iowa…