From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Argonaut Insurance v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railroad

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 24, 1966
367 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1966)

Summary

ruling in a diversity case that Texas law would be applied to determine the parties subrogation rights and ability to intervene in a Texas forum, where the workers' compensation was paid in Oklahoma

Summary of this case from Criswell v. Convenience Stores, Inc.

Opinion

No. 23035.

October 24, 1966.

L.W. Anderson, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

A.B. Hankins, Simpson, Adkins, Fullingim Hankins, Amarillo, Tex., for appellee.

Before JONES, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.


The appellant, Argonaut Insurance Company, issued a compensation insurance policy to Gibbens Slentz, Inc. It was in the well servicing business, primarily in Oklahoma but to some extent in Texas. The policy covered the operation of the insured in both states. Four employees of the insured were sent to a job in Texas. At the end of a work day, the employees started to return from Texas to their homes in Oklahoma in a pick-up truck owned by the insured, their employer. While still in Texas, the vehicle in which they were riding collided with a train of the appellee, Panhandle and Santa Fe Railroad Company, and all four employees were killed. Those entitled under the compensation laws filed claims under the Oklahoma law and awards were made to the claimants. Having paid the sums awarded under the Oklahoma Act, Argonaut brought an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Panhandle and Santa Fe, asserting a right of subrogation under the Texas statute. No right of subrogation exists under the Oklahoma compensation act. The Texas statute provides for subrogation to indemnify the insurer, but only where compensation is claimed under the Texas compensation law. The district court held that since the compensation claims were asserted and paid by Argonaut under the Oklahoma compensation law, which bars any right of subrogation in a death claim, no recovery could be had. A summary judgment was entered for Panhandle and Santa Fe. The judgment of the district court was correct and is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Argonaut Insurance v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railroad

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 24, 1966
367 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1966)

ruling in a diversity case that Texas law would be applied to determine the parties subrogation rights and ability to intervene in a Texas forum, where the workers' compensation was paid in Oklahoma

Summary of this case from Criswell v. Convenience Stores, Inc.
Case details for

Argonaut Insurance v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railroad

Case Details

Full title:ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PANHANDLE AND SANTA FE RAILROAD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 24, 1966

Citations

367 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Seaboard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Kurth

Both instruments appear to be forms used in Texas in workmen's compensation cases. We have no knowledge…

Perry v. Carter

We find no state court decisions in Missouri considering which state's law should be applied in this…