From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Archdiocesan Housing Auth. v. Demmings

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Oct 15, 2001
108 Wn. App. 1035 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Demmings, the court held that it was not unreasonable for a landlord to adopt and apply to current tenants a rule excluding convicted sex offenders from living in its apartments.

Summary of this case from Miller v. McCormick
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 46157-5-I.

October 15, 2001. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-2-27096-7, Robert H. Alsdorf, J., entered March 3, 2000.

Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Becker, A.C.J., and Webster, J.

Summaries of

Archdiocesan Housing Auth. v. Demmings

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Oct 15, 2001
108 Wn. App. 1035 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001)

In Demmings, the court held that it was not unreasonable for a landlord to adopt and apply to current tenants a rule excluding convicted sex offenders from living in its apartments.

Summary of this case from Miller v. McCormick
Case details for

Archdiocesan Housing Auth. v. Demmings

Case Details

Full title:ARCHDIOCESAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent v. ROLAND DEMMINGS, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Oct 15, 2001

Citations

108 Wn. App. 1035 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001)
108 Wash. App. 1035

Citing Cases

Miller v. McCormick

The first is not a Section 8 case. See Archdiocesan Hous. Auth. v. Demmings, No. 46157-5-I, 2001 Wash. App.…

1 Citing Cases