Summary
adopting State v. E.N. , 455 So.2d 636, 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (holding, as to the predecessor school trespass statute, that "the legislature did not intend that any student of any public school any where could enter and remain on the premises of a school in which he or she was not enrolled and otherwise had no legitimate business or authorization. A person who is not a student, officer or employee of a public school; who does not have legitimate business on the campus; or who is not a parent, etc. of a student enrolled at such school, commits a trespass when entering or remaining on the campus or other facility of such school."), decision quashed on other grounds , 484 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 1986)
Summary of this case from J.H. v. StateOpinion
No. 85-903.
August 5, 1986.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ralph B. Ferguson, Jr., Judge.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calianne P. Lantz and Ralph Barreira, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
The facts in this case are substantially the same as those in State v. E.N., 455 So.2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev'd on procedural grounds, 484 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 1986). We agree with the Fifth District's analysis of the statute and affirm. See § 228.091(1), Florida Statutes (1985).
Affirmed.