From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andie v. Kaplan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 18, 1942
43 N.E.2d 82 (N.Y. 1942)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Andie v. Kaplan (288 N.Y. 685) the Court of Appeals dismissed a complaint which sought to recover gifts of money and jewelry delivered as an incident of a contract of marriage claimed to have been fraudulently induced and which the defendant did not intend to honor.

Summary of this case from Grishen v. Domagalski
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 1942

Decided June 18, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, DAVIS, J.

Sidney W. Fischman and David L. Sprung for appellant.

Robert C. Finkelstein for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.

Summaries of

Andie v. Kaplan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 18, 1942
43 N.E.2d 82 (N.Y. 1942)

In Andie v. Kaplan (288 N.Y. 685) the Court of Appeals dismissed a complaint which sought to recover gifts of money and jewelry delivered as an incident of a contract of marriage claimed to have been fraudulently induced and which the defendant did not intend to honor.

Summary of this case from Grishen v. Domagalski
Case details for

Andie v. Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM ANDIE, Appellant, v. NECHOMIE KAPLAN, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 18, 1942

Citations

43 N.E.2d 82 (N.Y. 1942)
43 N.E.2d 82

Citing Cases

Bates v. Engelman

It is plain that this count is insufficient in law; that the cause of action sought to be pleaded is barred…

Bates v. Engelman

It is plain that this count is insufficient in law; that the cause of action sought to be pleaded is barred…

36 Citing Cases