Summary
dismissing complaint because it did not allege that defendants' principal purpose was the collection of debts or that it regularly sought to collect debts owed or due another
Summary of this case from Davidson v. Capital One Bank (Usa), N.A.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:11-CV-4091-TWT
08-27-2012
MATTHEW ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY As Trustee for the Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF1, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF1, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
This is a foreclosure action asserting claims under the Fair Debt Collections Act inter alia. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 23] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 3] be granted. The Plaintiff's Objections are without merit for the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 3] is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's Motion for TRO [Doc. 2] is DENIED.
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
United States District Judge