From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.M. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 25, 2003
853 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

arriving at a hearing one hour late because the parents were mistaken about the public transportation schedule

Summary of this case from S.C. v. Dept. of Children Fam

Opinion

Case Nos. 4D03-662, 4D03-885..

Opinion filed June 25, 2003. Rehearing Denied September 26, 2003.

Consolidated appeals of non-final orders from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-1317 CJDP.

Kathleen K. Pena of Law Offices of Kathleen K. Pena, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant A.M. Denise E. Kistner of Law Offices of Denise E. Kistner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Z.M. No appearance for appellee.


The trial court entered a default against parents of S.M. who were late for a hearing in their termination of parental rights case filed against them by the Florida Department of Children and Families. Because they were mistaken about the public transportation schedule, the parents arrived at the courthouse about one hour after their hearing was to begin. The default had the effect of consenting to the termination of their parental rights. The trial court held a hearing on the parents' motion to set aside the default, and denied the motion.

This court recently decided two strikingly similar cases. See A.J. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D1243 (Fla. 4th DCA May 21, 2003); R.P. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 835 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Significant in the present case, as in R.P., this court discussed section 39.801(3)(d), Florida Statutes, explaining that although the statute authorizes a default at the advisory hearing in termination of parental rights cases,

courts should ordinarily refrain from determining a termination of parental rights by default where an absent parent is making reasonable effort to be present at the scheduled hearing and is delayed by forces or circumstances beyond the parent's control.

Section 39.801(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2001), provides "If the person served with notice under this section fails to personally appear at the advisory hearing, the failure to personally appear shall constitute consent for termination of parental rights by the person given notice."

835 So.2d at 1214.

We find the refusal to vacate the default an abuse of discretion.

REVERSED.

STONE, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

A.M. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 25, 2003
853 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

arriving at a hearing one hour late because the parents were mistaken about the public transportation schedule

Summary of this case from S.C. v. Dept. of Children Fam
Case details for

A.M. v. Dept. of Children Families

Case Details

Full title:A.M. and Z.M., Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 25, 2003

Citations

853 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

S.C. v. Dept. of Children Fam

Certainly, this court has made it clear that constructive consent in termination of parental rights cases…

M.B. v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Families

However, we have explained that "courts should ordinarily refrain from determining a termination of parental…