From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexsey v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1994
205 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Summary

finding state and federal income tax expenses natural and foreseeable consequences of defendant's breach

Summary of this case from Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United States

Opinion

June 20, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is granted, and the defendants are directed to pay the plaintiffs $82,500, plus interest from April 15, 1990, representing Federal and State income taxes paid as a result of the defendants' breach of contract, and $9,918.80, with interest on $4,328 from December 19, 1988, and on $5,590.80 from April 18, 1989, representing refinancing costs incurred on those dates as a result of the defendants' breach of contract.

The plaintiffs have presented uncontroverted evidence that they had intended by means of the real property sale at bar to accomplish a tax-free exchange of real property under Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) § 1031-a purpose of which the defendants were aware. However, as a result of the defendants' breach of the instant contract, the plaintiffs were obliged to pay $82,500 in State and Federal income taxes upon transfer of title to the instant parcel (see, Virgin Atl. Airways v. National Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, cert denied ___ US ___, 113 S Ct 67), as well as $9,918.80 in refinancing charges incurred when they were obliged to refinance their home in order to discharge their obligations under the second contract. These expenses, representing the natural and foreseeable consequences of the defendants' breach, are compensable as damages (see, Ward v. New York Cent. R.R. Co., 47 N.Y. 29; Charles E.S. McLeod, Inc. v Hamilton Moving Stor., 89 A.D.2d 863, 865).

We reject as without merit the defendants' claim that the plaintiffs' application is precluded by various procedural bars. Thompson, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alexsey v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1994
205 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

finding state and federal income tax expenses natural and foreseeable consequences of defendant's breach

Summary of this case from Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United States
Case details for

Alexsey v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ALEXSEY et al., Appellants, v. JOAN L. KELLY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 736

Citing Cases

Dempsey v. Chaves & Perlowitz LLP

The defendants' claim that the plaintiff failed to plead ascertainable damages because the plaintiff's…

DeSantis v. Oakmont LLC

If the defendant then causes plaintiff to lose the contemplated tax advantage, that loss may be included as…