From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
May 13, 1977
150 N.J. Super. 47 (App. Div. 1977)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding the rules of law which apply to partners also apply to joint ventures

Summary of this case from Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

Argued April 26, 1977 —

Decided May 13, 1977.

Appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.

Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr. argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Gigante Aslanian, attorneys).

Mr. Howard M. Nashel argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Platoff, Heftler, Harker Nashel, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The portions of the order for judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gaulkin in his opinion reported at 142 N.J. Super. 546 (Law Div. 1976).

Summaries of

68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
May 13, 1977
150 N.J. Super. 47 (App. Div. 1977)

holding the rules of law which apply to partners also apply to joint ventures

Summary of this case from Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.

holding the rules of law which apply to partners also apply to joint ventures

Summary of this case from Chiron v. Director, Div. of Taxation

finding by receiver, confirmed by the court, in prior action which was held by receiver and court to be essential to judgment was binding in subsequent action

Summary of this case from Gregory Marketing v. Wakefern Food Corp.
Case details for

68th Street Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella

Case Details

Full title:68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL.…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: May 13, 1977

Citations

150 N.J. Super. 47 (App. Div. 1977)
374 A.2d 1222

Citing Cases

Watts v. Farinella

142 N.J.Super. 546, 561 n.3 (Law Div. 1976) (noting a legal theory not advanced in the pleadings or pretrial…

Wanaque Borough v. West Milford

However, when a joint venturer has "wrongfully caused the termination of the relationship" prior to…

23 Citing Cases