From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zozak v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 7, 1991
576 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-943.

December 4, 1990. On Motion for Rehearing and to Certify Question February 7, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; Seymour Benson, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO CERTIFY THE QUESTION

We GRANT Appellant's motion for rehearing and certify to the supreme court the same question raised in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?


Summaries of

Zozak v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 7, 1991
576 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Zozak v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS WALTER ZOZAK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 7, 1991

Citations

576 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Boyd v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review the consolidated cases of Boyd v. State, 572 So.2d 1032, 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA…