From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Znajmiecki v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 15, 1990
569 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-746.

November 15, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Joseph P. Baker, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

COWART, J., dissents with opinion.


I dissent for the reasons given in the dissent to Flowers v. State. The "legal constraint" factor on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet should not, for any reason, be multiplied.


Summaries of

Znajmiecki v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 15, 1990
569 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Znajmiecki v. State

Case Details

Full title:WALTER ZNAJMIECKI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 15, 1990

Citations

569 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. State

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED on the authority of (1) State v. Williams, 576 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1991); (2) Lipscomb v.…

Swinson v. State

COWART, Judge, dissenting. See the dissents in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Doughty…