From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zimmerman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 5, 1990
554 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-00675.

January 5, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, E. Randolph Bentley, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Donna A. Provonsha, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the defendant's sentence which was an upward departure from the presumptive guidelines sentence. The defendant's negotiated plea agreement was a valid reason upon which to base a departure sentence. Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1988).

Appellant also argues that the trial court erred in failing to rule upon his pro se motion for jail time credit. This motion may not have come to the court's attention until after appellant had filed his notice of appeal. Accordingly, this opinion is without prejudice to appellant to renew the motion after our mandate has issued.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zimmerman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 5, 1990
554 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Zimmerman v. State

Case Details

Full title:TOM ELLIS ZIMMERMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 5, 1990

Citations

554 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Hammond v. State

As a general rule, despite scoresheet error, a negotiated plea agreement is binding, and is sufficient to…

Floyd v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 1988); Hicks v. State, 559 So.2d 1265, 1266…