From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zimmerman v. Burtis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 1981
80 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

February 17, 1981


In an action to recover the reasonable value of legal services rendered, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 16, 1980, as denied that portion of her decedent's motion which was for partial summary judgment dismissing, on Statute of Limitations grounds, so much of the plaintiff's second amended complaint as seeks to recover for services rendered prior to September 10, 1969. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion for partial summary judgment granted, and that portion of plaintiff's second amended complaint which seeks to recover for services rendered prior to September 10, 1969, is dismissed. The plaintiff's original complaint failed to give notice of any "transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences" prior to September 10, 1969. Accordingly, his second amended complaint, insofar as it seeks to recover the reasonable value of legal services rendered prior to that date, is time-barred. (See CPLR 203, subd [e]; Heitczman v Muran, 75 A.D.2d 805; Marsala v. State of New York, 41 A.D.2d 878.) Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zimmerman v. Burtis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 1981
80 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Zimmerman v. Burtis

Case Details

Full title:HARRY ZIMMERMAN, Respondent, v. JANE W. BURTIS, as Executrix of CHARLOTTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1981

Citations

80 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Moezinia v. Ashkenazi

Here, the plaintiff's causes of action, as alleged in his initial complaint, were based on a written…