From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ben Gui Zhu v. Great River Holding, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 10, 2005
16 A.D.3d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5447.

March 10, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered April 14, 2004, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.


The ladder used by plaintiff was not an adequate safety device for the task he was performing, which entailed work at a significant elevation. Regardless of the method employed by plaintiff to remove the air conditioning unit, defendant's failure to provide a safety device sufficient to protect him from the elevation-related risk was a breach of the duty imposed by Labor Law § 240 (1), and a proximate cause of the fall and resulting injury ( see Dunn v. Consolidated Edison Co., 272 AD2d 129).


Summaries of

Ben Gui Zhu v. Great River Holding, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 10, 2005
16 A.D.3d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Ben Gui Zhu v. Great River Holding, LLC

Case Details

Full title:BEN GUI ZHU, Appellant, v. GREAT RIVER HOLDING, LLC, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 10, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Mayo v. Mktropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc.

See Mot. Seq. No. 006, Faegenburg Affirmation in Opposition and Reply, ¶ 29. Mayo cites a quantity of…

Mayo v. Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc.

Mayo cites a quantity of Appellate Division, First Department, precedent that evidence of a defendant…