From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Z.H. v. Lewisville Indep. Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 24, 2015
Case No. 4:12cv775 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 4:12cv775

03-24-2015

Z.H., a Minor, by and through his Parents and Next Friends, R.H. and J.H. Plaintiffs, v. LEWISVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 2, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record and Other Evidence (Dkt. 34) be DENIED; that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Dkt. 36) be GRANTED; that Plaintiffs take nothing by any of their claims in the underlying due process proceeding and this proceeding; that the decision of the Special Education Hearing Officer rendered for the State of Texas in Docket No. 241-SE-0412 be REVERSED as to the Special Education Hearing Officer's determination that Z.H.'s conduct was a manifestation of his disabilities; that Defendant be awarded its costs of court; and that this matter be closed on the court's docket.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record and Other Evidence (Dkt. 34) is DENIED; Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Dkt. 36) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs shall take nothing by any of their claims in the underlying due process proceeding and this proceeding; and the decision of the Special Education Hearing Officer rendered for the State of Texas in Docket No. 241-SE-0412 is REVERSED as to the Special Education Hearing Officer's determination that Z.H.'s conduct was a manifestation of his disabilities. Further, Defendant shall be awarded its costs of court, and this matter shall be closed on the court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this the 24th day of March, 2015.

/s/_________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Z.H. v. Lewisville Indep. Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 24, 2015
Case No. 4:12cv775 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Z.H. v. Lewisville Indep. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Z.H., a Minor, by and through his Parents and Next Friends, R.H. and J.H…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 24, 2015

Citations

Case No. 4:12cv775 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Heather H. v. Nw. Indep. Sch. Dist.

In sum, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to overturn the SEHO's decision. SeeZ.H. by & through…