From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 1978
359 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

Nos. 77-603, 77-776.

May 23, 1978. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978.

Appeals from Circuit Court, Dade County; Harold R. Vann, Judge.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, Rossman Baumberger, Miami, for appellants.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan O'Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judge.


By this appeal, appellants urge, among other things, that the trial court improperly charged the jury and that the jury verdict was not supported by the evidence.

Although the standard jury instructions were not used, the trial judge's own jury instructions fairly and adequately covered all issues and instructed the jury as to its duties in the trial. We find no error in this regard.

The evidence in the record supports the jury verdict. See Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v. Espinosa, 344 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Appellants' other arguments are deemed without merit. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 1978
359 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PETER ANTHONY ZELINSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PUROLATOR COURIER CORP.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 28, 1978

Citations

359 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)