From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zelaya v. Cappadona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 2002
294 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-03696

Argued April 18, 2002.

May 13, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated April 6, 2001, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Neil L. Kanzer, Garden City, N.Y. (Lorraine M. Korth and Steven T. Farmer of counsel), for appellant.

Schoen Strassman, LLP, Huntington, N.Y. (Joseph B. Strassman and Sheryl Sastow of counsel), for respondents.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff Earl Zelaya was injured when his vehicle collided with a vehicle operated by the defendant at the intersection of Allen Street and Long Beach Road in Hempstead. In moving for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant established that Zelaya brought his vehicle to a stop, and then proceeded into the intersection and collided with the defendant's oncoming vehicle, which had the right of way. The defendant thus demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142[a]; Rumanov v. Greenblatt, 251 A.D.2d 566; Nunziata v. Birchell, 238 A.D.2d 555). Under the circumstances, the allegations of the plaintiffs' attorney in opposition were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the defendant's contributory negligence (see Wolfson v. Milillo, 262 A.D.2d 636; Cascio v. Scigiano, 262 A.D.2d 264; cf. Patti v. Fennimore, 181 A.D.2d 869; Bogorad v. Fitzpatrick, 38 A.D.2d 923, affd 31 N.Y.2d 984). Consequently, the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

FLORIO, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zelaya v. Cappadona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 2002
294 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Zelaya v. Cappadona

Case Details

Full title:EARL ZELAYA, et al., respondents, v. RICHARD A. CAPPADONA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Meliarenne v. Prisco

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The defendant Dinesh Kripaliani…

LIM v. IMPELLIZZERI

New York courts have permitted judgment as a matter of law when the moving party has presented "undisputed…