From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zebulun v. Mamadou Oury Bah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2006
34 A.D.3d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

9705N.

November 30, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered May 4, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate a default judgment and renew a prior motion seeking to vacate dismissal of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.


Plaintiff's latest motion was not based upon new facts (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]) — the physician's affirmation he submitted was dated December 9, 2003 — and plaintiff did not explain his failure to present such facts on the prior motion (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]). Hence, leave to renew was properly denied ( see e.g. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v United States Fid. Guar. Co., 11 AD3d 300, 301; Chelsea Piers Mgt. v Forest Elec. Corp., 281 AD2d 252). The motion court was not obliged to grant plaintiffs request for renewal simply because defendants had failed to oppose it.


Summaries of

Zebulun v. Mamadou Oury Bah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2006
34 A.D.3d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Zebulun v. Mamadou Oury Bah

Case Details

Full title:DAMTE ZEBULUN, Appellant, v. MAMADOU OURY BAH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8884
823 N.Y.S.2d 897