From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zarcone v. Perry

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1981
55 N.Y.2d 782 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1981

Decided December 17, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK P. DE LUCA, J.

Arnold B. Firestone and Adrienne M. Mirro for appellant.

Edward J. Hart and Wade T. Dempsey for William M. Perry, respondent.

Mark J. Hanlon and James M. Maloney for Robert J. Anderson and others, respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice JAMES D. HOPKINS at the Appellate Division ( 78 A.D.2d 70), insofar as the result is based upon the principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. However, we express no view regarding the applicability of the rule prohibiting double recovery, as we conclude that it is unnecessary to reach that issue.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Zarcone v. Perry

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1981
55 N.Y.2d 782 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Zarcone v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS ZARCONE, Appellant, v. WILLIAM M. PERRY et al., Respondents, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 1981

Citations

55 N.Y.2d 782 (N.Y. 1981)
447 N.Y.S.2d 248
431 N.E.2d 974

Citing Cases

Yedid v. Sorkin

Nor is the claim for damages against Sorkin and Heymann for participating in petitioner’s ouster barred by…

Yedid v. Sorkin

However, so much of the 2021 proceeding as seeks damages against Sorkin and Heymann for participating in…