From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zambrano v. Pilhwan Seok

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 18, 2000.

November 13, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated October 22, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Roura Melamed, New York, N.Y. (Alexander J. Wulwick of counsel), for appellants.

Epstein, Hill, Grammatico Gann, Mineola, N.Y. (Dennis S. Heffernan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The undisputed facts establish that the vehicle driven by the plaintiff, Hector Zambrano, was travelling west on 41st Avenue in Queens. As Zambrano made a left turn across 41st Avenue, his vehicle collided with the defendant's car, which was travelling east on 41st Avenue. Zambrano testified at his examination before trial that he did not see the defendant's car before the accident notwithstanding that he stopped for five to six seconds to look for eastbound traffic on 41st Avenue.

Under these circumstances, Zambrano was clearly negligent in failing to see that which he should have seen by the proper use of his senses. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment (see, Feder v. Greco, 240 A.D.2d 364).


Summaries of

Zambrano v. Pilhwan Seok

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Zambrano v. Pilhwan Seok

Case Details

Full title:CATHY ZAMBRANO, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PILHWAN SEOK, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 750

Citing Cases

Ward v. Dagostino

As the defendants' vehicle had the right of way. Lam was entitled to anticipate that the plaintiff would obey…

Vasquez v. Gaches

Several factual issues exist as to how the accident happened and which vehicle made an unsafe lane change in…