From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zafora v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 11, 2005
900 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D05-106.

April 13, 2005. Rehearing Denied May 11, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Henry Leyte-Vidal, Judge.

Luis Manuel Zafora, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William J. Selinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GREEN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.


Affirmed. Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (a claim of insufficient notice of intent to habitualize must be raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion within two years of the conviction becoming final).


Summaries of

Zafora v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 11, 2005
900 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Zafora v. State

Case Details

Full title:Luis Manuel ZAFORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 11, 2005

Citations

900 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Mingo v. State

The claimed notice deficiency, however, does not render the sentence "illegal" under Rule 3.800(a), and may…

Jackson v. State

850 motion as also filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 because the defendant claimed that…