Opinion
21 Civ. 9680 (JPC) (JLC)
08-18-2022
SOHEIL ZAERPOUR, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK et al., Defendants.
ORDER
JOHN P. CRONAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On August 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, Dkt. 64, of this Court's Opinion and Order dismissing the Complaint without prejudice, Dkt. 63. “Reconsideration of a court's previous order is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources.” Levitant v. Workers Comp. Bd. of N.Y., No. 16 Civ. 6990 (ER), 2019 WL 5853438, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). “The standard for granting such a motion is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked-matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court.” Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). Plaintiff has not identified any controlling decisions or data that the Court overlooked in its August 8, 2022, Opinion and Order. Because Plaintiff has not met the high standard for reconsideration, his motion is denied.
SO ORDERED.