From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yudenko v. Guarinni

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-cv-4161 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2010)

Summary

concluding that awarding costs would be punitive where the plaintiff who pursued Section 1983 action was disabled and had no assets

Summary of this case from Nein v. Tricam Indus.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-cv-4161.

June 14, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to vacate clerk's taxation of costs (Doc. #100), defendants' response thereto (Doc. #101), and plaintiff's reply (Doc. #102), it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. The Clerk of Court's taxation of costs is vacated.


Summaries of

Yudenko v. Guarinni

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-cv-4161 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2010)

concluding that awarding costs would be punitive where the plaintiff who pursued Section 1983 action was disabled and had no assets

Summary of this case from Nein v. Tricam Indus.

concluding that awarding costs would be punitive where the plaintiff who pursued Section 1983 action was disabled and had no assets

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Warminster Twp.

denying copying costs where defendants failed to provide a description of the copies

Summary of this case from In re Aspartame Antitrust Litig.

vacating all costs

Summary of this case from DelGado v. United States

vacating costs of $3,576.37 in their entirety

Summary of this case from Mazzarella v. Brady

vacating costs where unsuccessful plaintiff had only $6.62 in his bank account, with an outstanding debt of $20,873.08

Summary of this case from Primrose v. Mellott

refusing to require plaintiff to pay costs when he had no income, was disabled, did not receive government assistance or benefits, had no assets, and owed a debt to Lancaster County in the amount of $20,000

Summary of this case from Primrose v. Mellot

noting that "the party seeking costs for copying . . . must provide evidence of the material copied so that the court can determine whether each copy was in fact necessary."

Summary of this case from U.S. Olympic Committee v. Tobyhanna Camp Corp.
Case details for

Yudenko v. Guarinni

Case Details

Full title:ANDREY YUDENKO, Plaintiff v. VINCENT GUARINNI, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 14, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-cv-4161 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. Olympic Committee v. Tobyhanna Camp Corp.

The prevailing party should submit evidence from which the court can determine whether each cost is…

Thomas v. Centennial Commc'ns Corp.

... "[D]istrict courts should use their common sense in making this determination."Yudenko v. Guarinni, No.…