Opinion
June 11, 1932.
Reeves, Todd, Ely, Price Beaty [ Richard Ely of counsel], for the plaintiff.
A.J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel [ N.E. Gatens and Bernard Berger, assisting], for the defendant.
The plaintiff claims exemption from taxes imposed by the city on that part of plaintiff's premises used as a tennis court. The defendant cites as authority Young Women's Christian Assn. v. City of N.Y. ( 217 A.D. 406; affd., 245 N.Y. 562) and Young Women's Christian Assn. v. City of N.Y. ( 220 A.D. 49; affd., 247 N.Y. 591), interpreting subdivision 7 of section 4 Tax of the Tax Law. In the first case cited the plaintiff maintained a cafeteria that had all the marks of a distinct business. It advertised. It solicited the patronage of the general public. In the second case cited the plaintiff operated a lodging house as a separate activity. In the case at issue plaintiff maintains a tennis court, not for profit, not as a business, but in the furtherance of the association's benevolent aim and not as an integer, but as a co-ordinate part of the organization. Judgment for plaintiff. Submit proposed findings and conclusions on notice.