From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Warden

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Sep 26, 2024
3:24-cv-01264 (KAD) (D. Conn. Sep. 26, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-01264 (KAD)

09-26-2024

LISA YOUNG Petitioner, v. WARDEN Respondent.


RULING AND ORDER

KARI A. DOOLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Lisa Young's Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) at ECF Nos. 6, 10, and 12, requesting to proceed in her habeas action without paying the $5 filing fee. For the following reasons, these motions are DENIED.

It is well settled that the decision to proceed in forma pauperis in civil cases is committed to the sound discretion of the district court. See Rahimi v. Sec'y of Navy, No. 3:19-CV-01852 (JAM), 2019 WL 6529458, at *2 (D. Conn. Dec. 4, 2019). In exercising this discretion, the court must determine whether the burden of paying the fees for filing and service would either hamper the petitioner's ability to obtain the necessities of life or force her to abandon the action. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948); Potnick v. E. State Hosp., 701 F.2d 243, 244 (2d Cir. 1983) (per curiam).

Young's motions, read together, show she receives no money from employment or investments, has no assets, monthly expenses, or debts, and does not support any dependents. See ECF Nos. 6, 10, 12. Young's trust fund account statement dated September 7, 2024, shows she spent $372.10 from her trust fund account from August 8, 2024, to September 5, 2024. See ECF No. 13. The source of those funds is unknown, but Young received a $100 Western Union wire transfer as recently as September 2, 2024. See id. Young's trust fund account balance as of September 7, 2024, was $88.71.

In short, Young's current trust fund balance of $88.71 and her recent account history shows that she can pay the $5 filing fee without forgoing life's necessities or causing her to abandon the action. Accordingly, Young's Motions for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis at ECF Nos. 6, 10, and 12 are DENIED. See Clark v. Pappoosha, No. 3:21CV1690 (CSH), 2022 WL 960296, at *2 (D. Conn. Mar. 30, 2022) (finding that plaintiff could pay the $402 filing fee when he had $492.70 in his trust account).

All further proceedings in this matter shall be held in abeyance for thirty (30) days pending the Plaintiff's delivery of the filing fee in the amount of $5 (money order or bank check made payable to the Clerk of Court) to the Clerk's Office, 915 Lafayette Boulevard, Bridgeport, CT 06604.

Failure to tender the filing fee on or before October 26, 2024, will result in the dismissal of this action.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Young v. Warden

United States District Court, D. Connecticut
Sep 26, 2024
3:24-cv-01264 (KAD) (D. Conn. Sep. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Young v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:LISA YOUNG Petitioner, v. WARDEN Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, D. Connecticut

Date published: Sep 26, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-01264 (KAD) (D. Conn. Sep. 26, 2024)